Sign Up for Email News

  • CommuterPageBlog and CommuterPage.com
    Sign up to receive new blog posts by email. You can also choose to receive current stories from local news sources about biking, walking, Metro, local bus systems, and more.

Recommended TDM Reading

Favorite Blogs/Sites Beyond the Beltway

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 10/2006

Politics

February 04, 2009

Where's the Operations-Ready in the Shovel-Ready Stimulus?

Shovel Dr. Gridlock (Stimulating a Better Commute, January 29, 2009; Washington Post) and Eric Weiss (New Cash, Not New Projects, January 29, 2009; Washington Post) discuss what the Stimulus may mean for our commute here in the DC area. The good news is that the stimulus will pump money into state DOTs and Metro for shovel-ready transportation projects that would other-wise not happen anytime soon. But according to the authors, as much as these are needed, it doesn't seem like these projects will really improve your commute anytime soon.

Atlanta traffic Says Weiss "Although the stimulus funds might sound like a lot of money, they fall far short of the region's needs. Washington has the second-worst traffic in the country, according to the Texas Transportation Institute. Only Los Angeles has worse." And both Weiss and Dr. Gridlock point out that the money will be spent on existing, not new projects, with emphasis on maintenance. Says the good Dr. "But huge as this stimulus plan is, it won't be cutting 20 minutes off your commute or guaranteeing you a seat on a train. That's going to take a bit longer and cost a lot more."

But there are indeed some "operations-ready" programs we could initiate or expand right now that would affect the area's roads in the short term. Problem is the entire Stimulus discussion seems to be centered on capital - thus the term shovel-ready - projects. We just need policy makers to include some of these lower-cost, yet high impact TDM operations-ready programs along with the shovel-ready list.

What am I talking about?

Transportation information display logo Reprising some of a post done a while back (Time For Plan B for Northern Virginia Traffic. Invest More In TDM, July 1, 2008, CommuterPageBlog), there are indeed things the region could do more of to help alleviate traffic congestion, and help our environment at the same time, in the relatively short-term. It's called TDM (transportation (or travel) demand management). It's fairly inexpensive when compared to building additional supply (roads and transit) and it can be implemented much more quickly than capital intensive projects. Don't take my word for it. According to the Transportation Research Board:

"Many studies that have compared mobility and air quality strategies have concluded that demand management strategies are among the most cost-effective in that they can reduce a trip, mile of travel or ton of emissions for a relatively modest amount of money. Demand-side strategies may not be the primary solution to these problems, but if they are applied in the right situation, they can help address traffic and air pollution problems in modest, yet very affordable way.

 Mobile store street side Most localities across the U.S. woefully underfund demand-side strategies. I'm not sure why. Perhaps because it's the softer side of transportation, because it is less understood or newer. There's a build it and they'll come philosophy with transportation projects that just isn't borne out by the research when it is applied to non-drive alone modes. It's time the politicians and transportation planners put some real money into the demand side. Tripling the budgets of local and regional TDM agencies annually would be equivalent to the cost of enhancing one local traffic interchange and have way more regional impact.

CFDExpoATPtable2lr One of the main tenants of the Stimulus is job creation. If new TDM programs were started or the existing ones were quickly expanded (this would take months not years), TDM agencies across the country would be hiring sales people to help companies implement flex-time, telework, and commuter benefits; customer service agents working at retail Commuter Stores; distribution staff who process and deliver transportation information to individuals and companies; logistics staff who keep information up-to-date at bus stops or in building lobbies and retail stores; commuter specialists who help you over the phone or online or who fulfill your ticket request; marketing people who help you understand the benefits of commute options; web people who develop cool tools to make your commuter easy; and people who educate about biking, walking and other modes. This is just some of what TDM looks like as an operation on the ground.

Investments in operations-ready TDM would mean more jobs and less congestion. Now. It needs to be part of the Stimulus and overall transportation strategy of the region and country. And it will help all those shovel-ready transit and roads projects be more efficient too. It all needs to be done and to work together.

Resources about how TDM works and it's effectiveness:

Car_free_diet_logo Chris Hamilton is the Commuter ServicesChief for Arlington County in the Transportation Division of the Department of Environmental Services, manager of CommuterPageBlog and a Metro/biking commuter from Rosemont in Alexandria.

July 16, 2008

Time For Plan B for Northern Virginia Traffic. Invest More In TDM - Part 1

"It was bad enough for gridlocked Northern Virginia that leaders in Richmond failed this week to come up with a transportation funding plan, but there's even worse news: There's no Plan B. The result will be more congested roads, crowded trains and possibly an exodus of jobs from the region, officials said yesterday."

Traffic_picture Thus began a story by the ever thoughtful Eric Weiss and Michael Laris in Saturday's Washington Post about the consequences for Northern Virginia on the failure of our elected officials to successfully deal with transportation funding issues (Hope for The Best, Expect The Worst, July 12). Weiss and Laris document the opportunities lost to partisan bickering for an infusion of needed dollars that would help Northern Virginia climb out of the second-worst traffic congestion in the nation. Local officials worry about Northern Virginia's competitiveness with other areas and cite companies moving away from Atlanta's traffic-clogged roads as a cautionary tale. But what really struck me about the story though was the statement that "there's no Plan B." True enough.

There doesn't seem to be any Plan B other than to hope for the political players to change next election and to try again next year. However, there are indeed things Northern Virginia could do more of to help alleviate traffic congestion, and help our environment at the same time, in the relatively short-term. It's called TDM (transportation (or travel) demand management). It's fairly inexpensive when compared to building additional supply (roads and transit) and it can be implemented much more quickly than capital intensive projects. Don't take my word for it. According to the Transportation Research Board:

"Many studies that have compared mobility and air quality strategies have concluded that demand management strategies are among the most cost-effective in that they can reduce a trip, mile of travel or ton of emissions for a relatively modest amount of money. Demand-side strategies may not be the primary solution to these problems, but if they are applied in the right situation, they can help address traffic and air pollution problems in modest, yet very affordable way.

Commuter_store_crystal_city So what is TDM? Managing demand encourages travelers to change their travel mode from driving alone to a shared ride, public transit, bike, walk or other alternatives like telework. It also encourages those who do drive to make informed choices of travel route, time and location. (Here's one local example of how you get people to do this). These strategies help us get the best we can out of our existing roads and transit infrastructure. Simple enough. So TDM could be our Plan B, right?

I think it is fair to say that if our region is going to maintain its quality of life and it's competitiveness we need to invest more money in transportation infrastructure from transit to bike facilities to roads and more walkable streetscapes. Using TDM should always be part of the mix to get the most out of these facilities. But for the short-term, if there isn't the hundreds of millions we need and expected on the supply-side, shouldn't we be putting more money than we currently are, maybe tens of millions, into TDM as our Plan B? Surely we can come up with that relatively small amount.

Carpooling1 Northern Virginia, the region and most places across the U.S. woefully underfund demand-side strategies. I'm not sure why. Perhaps because it's the softer side of transportation, because it is less understood or newer. Other than in Arlington and parts of Montgomery County the staff and resources allocated to TDM across the region is a pittance compared to what is spent on the supply side of transportation. And Arlington and Montgomery - as good of models as they are - could be doing a whole lot more if they had the resources. It's time the politicians and transportation planners put some real money into the demand side. Doubling or even tripling the budgets of local and regional (Commuter Connections) TDM agencies annually would be equivalent to the cost of enhancing one traffic interchange. The results could help us better get through these tough times. It could be our Plan B.

In some near future posts I'll begin to explore some specific examples. In the meantime there are some resources below for folks that want to learn more.

Resources:


Chris Hamilton is the Commuter Services Chief for Arlington County, manager of CommuterPageBlog and The TDM Professional blog and is a biking/Metrorail commuter from Alexandria, Virginia just outside of Washington, D.C.

July 11, 2008

Quote of the Day: People are Tired of Sitting in Traffic

Yvonne_miller_va_state_senator " Solutions have escaped us because we can't imagine a Virginia in which businesses will leave because of traffic, or that the military could leave. But businesses can leave and the military will leave and yank its people if it can't move them around like they need to. And our universities won't prosper if people can't get to them...Imagine what Virginia will be like if businesses leave, if the military leaves and our children leave because the good jobs are gone.? Anything we can make up our minds to do, we can do. And we must solve this transportation problem."

Senator Yvonne B. Miller, Norfolk
Senate Finance Committee Debate on SB6009
June 26, 2008
Quote from the Northern Virginia Transportation Alliance


Chris Hamilton is the Commuter Services Chief for Arlington County, manager of CommuterPageBlog and The TDM Professional blog and is a biking/Metrorail commuter from Alexandria, Virginia just outside of Washington, D.C.

July 10, 2008

Quote of the Day: We Cannot Drill Ourselves Out of this Situation

Parris_glendening_2 "We have to keep pace with demands for public transit, and give this country a reason to be proud of its high-speed trains, light-rail lines, and both rapid and conventional bus transit. We need to make more of our streets safe and convenient for walking and biking to work, school, shops and transit stops. We have to create incentives for developers to invest in our close-in suburbs and urban centers, to meet the huge demand for affordable homes in convenient locations. Americans are not dumb: We would much rather invest in well-located real estate than in gasoline.

We are tired of feeling like victims – whether of oil companies, poor planning, or a lack of vision. We are ready for innovative change, if only our leaders will follow us."

Parris N. Glendening
President of the Smart Growth Leadership Institute and Former Maryland Governor
July 7, 2008; Americans Demand More and Better Options, Planetizen


 

Chris Hamilton is the Commuter Services Chief for Arlington County, manager of CommuterPageBlog and The TDM Professional blog and is a biking/Metrorail commuter from Alexandria, Virginia just outside of Washington, D.C.

July 09, 2008

Quote of the Day: The Time Tax is the Time You Spend Stuck in Traffic

"The time tax is the time you spend stuck in traffic. And when you talk to people, they're stuck in traffic, they're not home with their kids, they can't get to work. What's more valuable, your time or your money? Well they're both valuable, but for some people, time is actually at that point worth more, so you've got to cut the time tax."

Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano in an interview on June 27, 2008 with Dan Goldstein at The American Prospect in answer to the following question:

Janet_napolitano Question: "Your transportation plan is built around a sales tax, and must be approved by voters at the ballot. But it seems that throughout the nation, with the exception of a few major cities, asking people to drive less and consider other modes of transportation has not worked very well. That's why we see this pandering from Senators Clinton and McCain on lifting the gas tax. Is mass transit a losing issue?"

Full Response:  "I would disagree. I would think, for example, that light rail to link Tucson to Phoenix to Flag, up the center spine of our state, particularly if there are spokes that go out into other transit, particularly in light of the ever-increasing cost of gasoline, makes a lot of sense from a commercial-traffic standpoint if not just a passenger-traffic standpoint. And again, well over half of these funds are going toward highways and roads. It's going to reduce what I call the time tax.  The time tax is the time you spend stuck in traffic. And when you talk to people, they're stuck in traffic, they're not home with their kids, they can't get to work. What's more valuable, your time or your money? Well they're both valuable, but for some people, time is actually at that point worth more, so you've got to cut the time tax."


Chris Hamilton is the Commuter Services Chief for Arlington County, manager of CommuterPageBlog and The TDM Professional blog and is a biking/Metrorail commuter from Alexandria, Virginia just outside of Washington, D.C.

July 02, 2008

Transportation Leadership from Maryland

Bencardin_1198_1_1254b_2 Some good stuff from U.S. Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland on public transportation Monday on the Grist (Maryland Senator Pushes for Better Transit, Efficiency, June 30, 2006):

Grist: You authored the transit portion of the Climate Security Act. Clearly this is a priority issue for you. What role do you think transit policy should play in climate legislation?

Sen. Cardin: A huge part. [The transit portion called for] $171 billion over the life of the bill. That's big money. That can make a major impact. It can make a huge difference in the capacity for transit programs. We are in desperate need of significant transit improvements. We've got to have the facilities and we don't today, and then we need the fare-box and economic policies that reward people for taking public transportation. Some try to say that it should be "self-sufficient" or have a certain percentage return through the fare-box. We don't do that on our roads, and public transportation is much better for so many reasons -- not just the environment or the quality of life. We should be providing much stronger incentives for people to use public transportation, but first you need to have the facilities.

I'm a big, big supporter of dramatic change in public transportation. It includes more than just the bus and rail systems in our urban areas. It includes a commuter rail and inner-city rail -- the whole gamut of services that get people out of their personal vehicles. I don't want people driving their personal vehicles the way they are today.

The entire article is worth a read. I'm glad we've got some transit leadership in the Senate from the local area.


 

Chris Hamilton is the Commuter Services Chief for Arlington County, manager of CommuterPageBlog and The TDM Professional blog and is a biking/Metrorail commuter from Alexandria, Virginia just outside of Washington, D.C.

July 01, 2008

Transportation for the 21st Century

Robert_puentes We learn from the good folks at Smart Growth Online that Brookings has recently released a report that analyzes the current state of the U.S. transportation system, identifies weakness, and outlines crucial points of action to build a transportation policy that works on federal State and local levels. The report entitled A Bridge to Somewhere: Rethinking American Transportation for the 21st Century and available for free online is penned by famed urban planning expert Robert Puentes. From the executive summary:

"In the past, strategic investments in our nation's transportation infrastructure - the railroads in the 19th century, the interstates in the 20th - turbocharge growth and transformed the country. But more recently, America's transportation infrastructure has not kept pace with the growth and evolution of its economy. At the precise time when the nation desperately needs to prioritize its limited investments and resources, the federal transportation program has lost focus."

The always thoughtfulBoston_train001_rc Puentes argues that the 100 largest metropolitan areas are the economic engine of the country and that they need a strong, deliberate and strategic federal partner to help meet the nation's most critical transportation challenges. He documents the problems with current transportation policy, calls for reforms and offers a new federal approach to investing in transportation that will be sustainable and keep America competitive.

Good stuff for policy experts and transportation professionals to ponder, especially during an election year.


Chris Hamilton is the Commuter Services Chief for Arlington County, manager of CommuterPageBlog and The TDM Professional blog and is a biking/Metrorail commuter from Alexandria, Virginia just outside of Washington, D.C.

June 06, 2008

Gas Prices - It's a Bigge Picture Than Your Pocketbook

The continuing rise in gas prices has everyone feeling the pinch, and many commuters who formerly drove alone are looking for less costly modes of travel to work, both around the DC region and the US.  This was highlighted in a May 27 Washington Post Article by Lena Sun and Jonathan Mummolo.  Here in the Washington area, we are relatively well-positioned to find cheaper ways to get around, with many transit systems, HOV lanes, vanpool providers, and carpool ride-matching services.  We also have agencies in most jurisdictions, such as Arlington County Commuter Services, which provide expert help to people in finding alternatives to solo driving, or to companies in helping their employees ease their commuting burden.  But there is a bigger picture in this than simply a pocketbook incentive to rideshare to save money.

Each year as gas prices rise during the summer vacation driving season, or when gas prices approach new psychological thresholds, such as $3 or $4 per gallon, people grudgingly look for options that can save them a few dollars, such as finding other ways to commute or buying a more fuel efficient car.  But typically, the numbers of people have been relatively small who switch to more sustainable travel modes or make permanent lifestyle changes to reduce consumption.  And, after the shock of higher prices wears off, many switch back to driving alone. 

Gas_pump_3 This time is different
There are many reasons why this is more than a seasonal nuisance, however.  It is time to hope that our political leaders will soon recognize they must institute major changes in our energy and transportation policies, and for us, the public, to realize that we must support them with some significant lifestyle changes.  Four factors are converging to make it clear that things must change, and soon, whether we do it willingly, or in the midst of a crisis.  Otherwise the future will be bleak, especially for our kids and future generations.  Indeed, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown warned on May 28 that the world faced an era-defining oil "shock" that required urgent action…"It is now understood that a global shock on this scale requires global solutions," Brown wrote in The Guardian newspaper. 

1.  Peak Oil and Rising Global Demand
There has been debate for years about when world oil production will peak, if it hasn’t already, with declining supply and permanent price hikes following.  Skeptics say we will always find more oil, or new technologies will produce oil from less oil-rich sources, such as tar sands, so not to worry.  However the signs are clear worldwide that older oil fields are playing out, the rate of discovery of new fields has dropped precipitously even with new discovery technologies, and tar sands and similar extractions are more expensive.  Worse yet, China, India, and other developing countries are rapidly following the US model of industrialization and transportation usage; and their explosion of demand for oil (and thus higher prices) is coming like a tidal wave.  There may be temporary dips, but it will take a miracle to save us from huge and permanent gas price rises.  New non-petroleum based energy sources must be found, and fast.

2.  Global Political Instability
Exacerbating the situation are global political issues such as the war in Iraq, actions by OPEC, potential terrorist activities, and threats of an attack against Iran.  Even minor disruptions in the regular flow of oil can have big impacts on world supply and price.  Major disruptions, such as another war, inevitably would bring large increases in gas prices, if not a global recession, or worse.  Drilling for more oil at home would simply prolong current usage trends and only briefly postpone our reckoning with the need for major new energy sources and transportation systems.  “Draining America first” is not a real strategy for energy security, whether it entails drilling in environmentally sensitive areas or not.  Again, it is clear that we need to find new sources of energy and different approaches to transportation in a hurry.

Snowy_commute_in_traffic 3.  Congestion and Transportation Capacity
Ever since the Interstate Highway System was substantially completed some thirty years ago, there has been relatively little investment in transportation system capacity, including mass transit.  As a result, travel demand has swamped our systems and traffic congestion has steadily worsened.  It has become clear that road building alone is not a solution, as there is not enough money or space for unlimited capacity expansion, and new lanes fill up almost as soon as they are built.  Inevitably, future transportation policy must focus on getting more efficiency from our existing transportation networks, moving more people in fewer vehicles, and finding new formulas for funding transportation that are not based on the declining gas tax alone.

4.  Global Warming
The fourth major factor is climate change, the disruptive effects of which are now abundantly clear, from polar ice melt, to wildfires, to storm patterns, and crop and forest damage.  If projections by the experts are even partially correct, the planet will face disastrous consequences within our lifetimes.  We in the US produce many times our share of greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming, and drastic collective and individual actions will be necessary to abate the damage.

Change is Needed – what we do matters
These conflicting factors add up to a very complex future in which we need to provide mobility for a growing population, reduce traffic, burn less oil to avoid heating the planet and conserve the supply, while transitioning to other sources of energy and finding transportation funding mechanisms not based on a dwindling gas tax.  Whew!  This is a huge imperative for changes in public policy at the national, state and local level.  All this will take time, and time is not on our side.  This also puts a focus on what we all do as individuals, because it is our collective actions that add up to the traffic on our streets and a large percentage of our total energy consumption and pollution output.  Fortunately, a common thread in all these issues is transportation, and we all can contribute to the solution, beginning today.

One easy way to assess how much you add to the problems, and how much you can contribute to the solution, is to go to Arlington’s Car-Free Diet website.  It has a simple calculator to see how much pollution you cause in your commute, how much money you spend, and how much you can reduce both of these by taking less costly and consumptive transportation options – if you aren’t already.

In a future blog, I’ll talk more about what can be done about policy issues, and share a look at some of the commuting trends in our area that seem to be changing in response to prices and other factors.  In the meantime, check out the Car-Free Diet and see what you can do right now.

Howard Jennings is Manager of Research and Development for Arlington Transportation Partners.  Depending on the day, he teleworks, or walks or rides the bus to Metrorail to get to work.

August 26, 2007

Mary Peters - The Folly of Higher Gas Taxes

Post1header Today's (Saturday, August 25) Washington Post included an op-ed by US Dept. of Transportation Secretary Mary Peters (who was just mentioned for other reasons on this blog the other day).  CollapseHer key point is that raising gas taxes to improve transportation infrastructure (which has been raised in the public's consciousness since the bridge collapse in Minnesota) is the wrong strategy.  She cites a couple of reasons:

1)  Because the money is deposited into a federal trust fund, its allocation becomes politicized, and Congress is apt to skew the priorities for its use.  I would tend to agree with this point.

2)  It does little or nothing to reduce traffic congestion, because it does not dissuade people from driving during congested times or on congested roadways.  I partially agree.  Large gas taxes would push people towards smaller cars and also get them to think about using them less, but it wouldn't necessarily affect congestion.  Small increases in the gas tax would probably make little difference.

Red_gas_pump I am in favor of raising gas prices, but for different reasons and in a different way.  Burning gasoline creates environmental damage.  Gas taxes could be used more appropriately to offset the damage caused by their use by being used for environmental protection.  A better strategy in my mind is that gas taxes could replace wage taxes.  The taxes collected would be used to reduce wage taxes.  This works well for progressivity of tax policy, because rich tend to buy more gas and poor pay more in wage taxes.

Her key point is that we currently provide virtually all of our roadways for free.  Any free good will tend to be overutilized.  The infrastructure itself should be priced rather than the gas.  I completely agree with this point.  Hap If people and businesses were charged for the use of the roads--more during congested times; possibly more for larger, more damaging vehicles--then they would start to make decisions based on their use.  That's the idea behind congestion pricing (another recent blog): charge people for their use.  If we tolled every road then a lot more people would choose to take the train or bus or ride their bike or otherwise think a bit harder before hopping in their car and driving.
=================================================
Steve Offutt, Arlington resident and Director - Arlington Initiative to Reduce Emissions (AIRE), Transportation Projects

August 21, 2007

Uninformed: Transportation Secretary Says Bikes Aren't Transportation

Secretary_of_transportation_mary__3Richard Layman at the Rebuilding Place blog points us (U.S. Government to Bicyclists: Drop Dead! August 20, 2007) to a story that happened late last week. According to the StreetsBlog story:

On the PBS NewsHour with Jim Leher, DOT Secretary Mary Peters (pictured here) in an interview by Gwen Ifill said that instead of raising taxes on gasoline to renew the nation's sagging infrastructure, Congress should examine its spending priorities -- including investing in bike paths and trails, which Peters said, "are not transportation."

From the transcript on the PBS website we learn more:

    • When asked about the possibility of adding a nickel a gallon to the gas tax for infrastructure: "I think we have to examine where we're spending money today. And if we think that we're spending money today in the highest and best use, then perhaps we would need to make that discussion, but I don't believe we are. You know, I think Americans would be shocked to learn that only about 60 percent of the gas tax money that they pay today actually goes into highway and bridge construction. Much of it goes in many, many other areas."
    • "Well, there's about probably some 10 percent to 20 percent of the current spending that is going to projects that really are not transportation, directly transportation-related. Some of that money is being spent on things, as I said earlier, like bike paths or trails. Some is being spent on museums, on restoring lighthouses, as I indicated."

Presumably if these areas don't include highways and bridges than it is an in-appropriate use of federal dollars? Sheesh.

StreetsBlog also provides a link to a STPP report from 2003, debunking the myth that bridges are in ill repair because of spending in "other areas."

The League of American Bicyclists is asking people to repsond to the Secretary's Office.


Chris Hamilton is the Commuter Services Chief for Arlington County, manager of CommuterPageBlog and The TDM Professional blog and a biking/Metro commuter from Rosemont in Alexandria, Virginia.